Skip to content

🐂 QCOM — Company Profile (Educational)

Educational site, not investment advice. Market cap / stock price / quarterly numbers change quickly, so we don't write them. Use SEC + Yahoo Finance links below to check current data.

📌 Basic Info

Field Value Source
Primary business Mobile SoC (Snapdragon) + modems + wireless IP licensing (QCT chip business + QTL licensing business — dual engine) 10-K FY25
Founded / HQ 1985 / San Diego, California, USA wiki
CEO Cristiano Amon (joined 2021/06) company announcement
Primary listing NASDAQ: QCOM
Fiscal year Ends late September (FY26 = 2025/10 - 2026/09) SEC EDGAR

💡 Real-time market cap / share price / segment revenue / licensing vs chip mix: see SEC primary + IR links below

🏭 Industry Chain Coordinates (Part 1-C6 framework)

Upstream (Who QCOM depends on)

Supplier What flows Key dependency
TSM Flagship Snapdragon N4/N3 foundry core dependency
SSNLF (Samsung Foundry) Some Snapdragon 8-series fab (dual-source) secondary supplier
SNPS + CDNS EDA software duopoly
ARM CPU IP license (Snapdragon uses ARM ISA) long-term agreement; QCOM's in-house Oryon core is reducing dependence

Downstream (Who depends on QCOM)

Customer What flows Concentration
AAPL 5G modem (Apple developing in-house; Qualcomm 2023/09/11 announced Snapdragon 5G Modem-RF supply agreement covers Apple 2024/2025/2026 launches) major single customer — see 10-K risk factors
Samsung Mobile (SSNLF) Snapdragon in flagship Galaxy key customer
Xiaomi / OPPO / VIVO (Chinese Android OEMs) Snapdragon SoC large China exposure
META Quest XR headset silicon early XR market
Auto OEMs (GM / Ford / BMW etc.) Digital cockpit / ADAS chips auto business is a growth engine

Competitors

  • Mobile SoC: MediaTek (2454.TW, Tier-B peer) · Apple A-series (AAPL internal) · Huawei HiSilicon (HUAWEI, China internal)
  • PC SoC (new battleground): INTC · AMD · AAPL M-series · NVDA (rumored PC chip)
  • Modems: AAPL (in-house) · MediaTek · HiSilicon
  • Licensing: ARM (architecture IP, some overlap)
  • Auto digital cockpit: NVDA (Drive) · INTC Mobileye

💼 Business Model + Value Capture (Part 1-C7 lens)

  • Revenue mix: QCT (chips, incl. handset + auto + IoT) ~85% / QTL (licensing) ~15%, but QTL's profit contribution far exceeds its revenue share (very high margin)
  • Gross margin: QTL licensing ~70%+ (intangibles, ultra-high margin); QCT chips ~30%; consolidated GAAP ~55%
  • Pricing power: QTL collects a per-5G-handset royalty (fixed rate + cap), validated multiple times in court — very strong; QCT faces pricing pressure from MediaTek / Apple
  • Replacement difficulty: QTL high (wireless standards are mandatory); QCT medium (AAPL in-house modem threat)

(For segment QCT vs QTL revenue / growth / GM, see latest SEC 10-Q)

🏰 Moat Assessment (Part 3-C2 Buffett 5-step lens)

Type Strength (0-1) Reasoning
Brand 0.6 Snapdragon brand has Android OEM + consumer recognition
Switching cost 0.5 OEMs take 1-2 years to switch SoC; long qualification relationships
Network effect 0.3 QTL licensing is based on 3GPP standards (scaled IP), not a classic network effect
Scale + cost 0.8 QTL licensing = near-zero marginal cost (intangibles); QCT benefits from R&D amortization

Total: 2.2 / 4 → medium-strong moat (QTL alone is 0.9+ moat; QCT is cyclical commodity middle)

⚠️ Key Invalidation Triggers (Part 3-C5 anti-thesis lens)

Monitor; if triggered, re-evaluate thesis:

  • Trigger 1 (event): Apple replaces QCOM with in-house 5G modem in iPhone (agreement expires 2027; progress is the central catalyst)
  • Trigger 2 (annual): QTL royalty rates re-adjudicated in court (history of litigation; key counterparties: Huawei / Samsung / Apple)
  • Trigger 3 (quarterly): Chinese Android OEM shipments YoY decline > 10% (QCOM has large China exposure)
  • Trigger 4 (technology): PC / Mac on ARM in-house SoC (Apple Silicon model) spreads → QCT loses PC market share
  • Trigger 5 (low probability): QTL antitrust split / major royalty rate reduction ruling

📚 SEC Primary Public Filings (DYOR)

Live quote: Yahoo Finance QCOM


Educational · Numbers change, the method does not · Make investment decisions based on your own research + risk tolerance